Wednesday 16th Jan 2019
Radiance Views Weekly
You are here: Home »  Report
Text size: A | A

Muslim Marriage a Civil Contract: HC

Report

Separating the institution of marriage from sacred or religious connotations conveniently used to deny women their due, the Kerala High Court on 9 June ruled that Muslim marriage is primarily a civil contract to legalise sexual intercourse. In the same vein, the court held that denying a woman her conjugal rights for an extended period amounts to “cruelty’’.

The ruling by a division bench comprising justices Pius C Kuriakose and PD Rajan was in response to an appeal by Sanjan S of Alappuzha against a family court’s decision to grant divorce to his wife on the ground that she was denied sex by him for over three years. The profound implications of the 21 March ruling are only beginning to sink into public consciousness.

The judgment authored by Justice Rajan says, “The concept of ‘marriage’ among Muslims from the very beginning itself (is) regarded as a contract. Muslim marriage has been defined as a civil contract for the purpose of legalising sexual intercourse and procreation of children. It is not a sacrament but a contract, though solemnised generally with the recitation of certain verses from the Qur’ān. Muslim law does not prescribe any religious service essential for solemnisation. Justice Krishna Iyer in Islamic Law in Modern India considered the concept of Muslim marriage and stated that “in its legal connotation, Muslim marriage is essentially a contract, though marriage as a social institution is regarded solemn all over the civilized world, including the Muslims.”

Sanjan got married on 16 May, 1999 according to Muslim religious rites and his wife delivered a child in August 2004. After February 2004, he avoided sexual contact with his wife, despite her insistence, for more than three years. In 2006 his wife left Sanjan’s home and filed for divorce in 2007 in the family court.

Upholding the family court’s decision granting divorce, the High Court held, “We are of the opinion that if husband refuses to (have) sex with his wife, when she demands for the same, (it) is a ground for “cruelty”. As a wife, she is expecting a healthy sexual relationship with her husband for the persistence of happy and harmonious married life.”

Sanjan’s counsel at the High Court, K Ramakumar, contended that the alleged cruelty of denying conjugal relations is not pleaded and proved in this case. There is no allegation that the matrimonial relationship was broken irretrievably, he argued. Advocate PK Ibrahim, who appeared for the wife, opposed this, arguing that the totality of the pleading and evidence show that the marriage was irretrievably broken and that the emotional bond between the couple is extinct.

While deciding the case, the High Court cited Section 2 of Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939, which states various grounds for divorce. According to Section 2, divorce can be granted if “the husband has failed to perform, without reasonable cause, his marital obligations for a period of three years.”



Top
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
Vol. LI No.11, 2013-06-16
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
ISLAMISTS UNDER FIRE 
From Egypt to Bangladesh
Vol. LI No.20, 2013-08-18
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
Political Implications of Ban on Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami
Vol. LI No.19, 2013-08-11
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
Egypt's Al-Sisi Dragged the Country into Civil War
Vol. LI No.18, 2013-08-04
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
The Scourge of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse
Vol. L No.43, 2013-01-20
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
Arab Spring: Promises and Challenges
Vol. L No.21, 2012-08-19
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
Just World Order
Vol. XLIX No.43, 2012-01-29
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
Let Us Refuse to Be Provoked
Vol. L No.27, 2012-09-30
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
The Islamists and Western Blinkers
Vol. L No.15, 2012-07-08
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
Death, Disappearance and Despair in India
Vol. L No.13, 2012-06-24
Setback to Withdrawal of Terror Cases Keeping poll promises or mocking with people?
Subscribe 
 
Focus Issue
 Enter your Email:
Submit